Erratum to: Social Thinking®: Science, Pseudoscience, or Antiscience?
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Social Thinking®: Science, Pseudoscience, or Antiscience?
Today, there are several interventions that can be implemented with individuals diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder. Most of these interventions have limited to no empirical evidence demonstrating their effectiveness, yet they are widely implemented in home, school, university, and community settings. In 1996, Green wrote a chapter in which she outlined three levels of science: evidence sci...
متن کاملScience and pseudoscience in social work practice.
In what case do you like reading so much? What about the type of the science and pseudoscience in social work practice book? The needs to read? Well, everybody has their own reason why should read some books. Mostly, it will relate to their necessity to get knowledge from the book and want to read just to get entertainment. Novels, story book, and other entertaining books become so popular this...
متن کاملWhy People Believe Weird Things: Science, Pseudoscience, and Critical Thinking
Dr. Michael Shermer, publisher of Skeptic magazine and a monthly columnist for Scientific American, presents his most popular lecture on science, pseudoscience, and superstitions, explaining mysteries and exploring the psychology of why people believe them. In the process, Dr. Shermer will consider how science works by looking at how it does not work. Dr. Michael Shermer is the Founding Publish...
متن کاملStudy of behavior: Science or pseudoscience
Before starting to write this paper I wanted to be certain of the precise meaning of the word “legacy’’. In the Concise Oxford Dictionary I found that it is “a material or immaterial thing handed down by predecessors”. Thus, I understand that I am here in a role of predecessor, expected to hand over my thoughts about the field of science I have been concerned with throughout my life to the pres...
متن کاملDistinguishing science from pseudoscience in school psychology: science and scientific thinking as safeguards against human error.
Like many domains of professional psychology, school psychology continues to struggle with the problem of distinguishing scientific from pseudoscientific and otherwise questionable clinical practices. We review evidence for the scientist-practitioner gap in school psychology and provide a user-friendly primer on science and scientific thinking for school psychologists. Specifically, we (a) outl...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Behavior Analysis in Practice
سال: 2016
ISSN: 1998-1929,2196-8934
DOI: 10.1007/s40617-016-0119-y